Splash Web Effects

In the wake of all of the hubbub about facebook’s security practices, the various how-tos and informational paranoia, I am asked quite frequently by friends and family of all levels of acquaintance about my continued use of frequent facebook and twitter updates, and their varying degrees of professionalism.

I am an avid social media user. I use twitter, facebook, linkedin and a host of other services. I check-in, I tweet and I update statuses. I post pictures of myself and my friends in fun, and silly engagements, such as playing rockband in my living room. I also tweet about what I’m working on (although I no longer post any actual details due to an NDA that covers my public speech). In short, I like to talk about what I am doing, a lot.

I enjoy disclosing details about my life. The reasons I have found for doing so- as they are generally rationalizations rather than instigating reasons- are many. I feel my professional and personal lives are enriched by a living, breathing, up-to-the-minute portfolio of not just my work, but my entire personhood. I also enjoy that it is easy for people I know to keep up with my day-to-day life, as I am young and mobile, and tend to lose contact with people for months at a time before revisiting them.

Now, most of the concerns shared by those that know and follow me are this: Are you not afraid people will judge you incorrectly, see you out of context or assume false things about you?

Of course not. My twitter feed, facebook profile, buzz list and linkedin updates are me in context. No more perfectly am I captured anywhere. I have a unique personality, varied interests and am overall, complex emotionally.

The company I work for while writing this post has a leader within it’s ranks that exemplifies everything right with corporate culture, and is someone I am deeply and profoundly proud to call my boss. The main thing done correctly is the hiring of new staff, as our company is growing rapidly. Many companies, especially in times of growth, tear themselves apart by giving each applicant only a cursory glance, comparing numerical qualifications and cherry-picking only the brightest gems, polished to the glossiest shine. These gems then mix in a pool of others, all gawdy and imperfectly aligned.

The art of arranging human beings so that they will best work together, and choosing those that have not become so set in their ways, and allowing them to support those that are set correctly- this is a skill that many so-called executives will never master in a lifetime. Selecting only the optimum arrangement, the most efficient, frictionless set of gears that don’t wear each other down due to ill-fitting size and shape, this is the skill practiced here.

But this skill is not something that can be summarized in a brief interview, or a scan of a few carefully selected words by a potential interviewee- it is best summarized by a portfolio of life that grows with a person- ideas and information growing and changing with the person it represents- something a simple resume could never do.

So yes, on my portfolio, you’ll find that I am a programmer- I have experience with Classic ASP and other server-side scripting languages. You’ll see how many years I have worked and who for. You will also see the whimsy and talent, the lack of sophistication and the supreme dedication I have to perfecting the profession I have chosen- all of this information is unmeasurable on purpose- it has to be cataloged accidentally, along the course of life, and through the lens of context.

Google, in all it’s well-meaning splendor and ethos of not being evil, has decided to make a change in policy regarding unaccredited pharmacies. Hooray.

Another change Google’s dropped on the table however, is that it’s stance on drugs from accredited pharmacies from our friends to the north has shifted dramatically. New rules state that Canadian pharmacies will no longer be able to target consumers in the US, and that search results will be filtered.

For those of us embroiled in the healthcare debate, either side acknowledges that prescriptions for drugs in the US are often far too costly, and not covered, or not covered very well by current insurance. Even life-saving or medically necessary drugs come at a high cost, and without subsidization by our government, many people do without their medicine, opting to feed their families at the cost of their own health.

Enter Canadian Pharmacies, such as canadianpharmacymeds.com – which is an accredited pharmacy in Canada. Many customers of the pharmacy receive medicine at much lower prices than at non-subsidized us pharmacies, or where generics are unavailable. Due to these new rules however, it could become much harder to comparison-shop, or even find these legitimate pharmacies in order to receive cheaper medication from reputable sources.

The problem that is not currently being solved however, is cutting down on pharmacies that have bad reputations for sending out sugar pills, or are fake/scam sites. These places have little moral or legal obligation to skirt past any rules Google imposes, and so the only people hurt by this are law-abiding, policy-following and generally reputable sources of medication in Canada.

Hopefully, Google will see these issues with the policy change and reverse course, as this is one of the few avenues consumers have of leveling the playing field with regards to healthcare and the rising cost of prescriptions.

So I have been searching in vain for days for an oAuth library for Classic ASP.

I believe that due to the nature of Classic ASP, the limited support and the random quirks (fewer than ASP.NET and yet somehow… people complain more…) there exists NO library for such a thing.

I’ve been looking through the PHP libraries and the coldfusion libraries and so on, and many of the objects and methods present just aren’t supported in Classic.

Problem is, Twitter is depreciating the Basic Auth methods soon, and you won’t be able to cURL in.

@Anywhere, which is a javascript library that will allow Twitter to interact with your DOM, is going to essentially become the Facebook Connect of Twitter. We’re looking at DOM level integration, so it’s server-side language independent. This comes out April 15th, and I can’t wait.

Until then, I can tweet using this library :

http://asp.web.id/first-version-of-asp-twitter-library.html

and store usernames and passwords (horrible, but necessary for 15 days…) for the time being. I’m sending out an authentication tweet that signals successful connection, and pulling the user_profile_pic out of the Twitter REST API Method: users lookup that makes it look a lot like Facebook Connect; it achieves the user interface experience I’m looking for.

So today, while trying to figure out why a cookie was mysteriously destroying itself, we stumbled upon an interesting turn of events that I can’t find anywhere on the net.

Apparently, Cookies won’t hold if they start with the word “Include”.

We had this cookie- INCLUDE_CORPORATE_BLOG , that wouldn’t transfer from page to page.

A session with the same name would, and so we were going to have to create an entire strange workaround trying to figure out why this piece of data wouldn’t hold. My colleague suggested that we try changing the name, partly joking, to which we said “couldn’t hurt”.

Turns out, in Classic ASP, you can’t have Cookies that start with the word “INCLUDE”.

I waited a bit after writing this- 3 months to be exact. I wanted to be sure I wasn’t fueled by a slight against my ego, and that the feminist rage I was feeling wouldn’t falter after time. This is the blogger equivalent of writing an angry letter and waiting till morning to send it.

Here I present, the most feminist rant ever.

A question I am invariably, and I do mean invariably, asked when people find out that I have a child, “How do you manage a family and working?”, or alternately, “Who watches your son while you are at work?”

The audacity of this question is understated, as it has clear implications: people always want to know- not as a polite aside like “What is his name”‘ “How old is he”, etc, is how I can be so irresponsible as to have a career when I have a child to raise. There are then unfortunate implications to that statement that do not merely happen to be rather rude and presumptive, but effect my career as well. Assumptions range that I do not actually like what I do, I am merely doing this to “feed my kids”, that I would not do this if I didn’t have to, that I am disorganized, rushed or hurried in my work, or that I simply do not care.
But this is not predijudice against parents- it is prejudice against mothers, spisifically. My male collegues, many of whom have children- some of whom are single parents- are never asked this question. They might be applauded, if they are single, but it is a badge of honor, not a mark of shame.
This stereotype is absurd- the idea that I would rather be a housewife or homemaker of any sort- that I don’t do what I love or love what I do- that my ambitions for myself are extensions of the ambition to provide well for my offspring, these assertions are ridiculous.
I am much more ambitious than many of my personal acquaintances, and many of my coworkers- but the assumption is that I would give it all up were I to marry someone well off, or attain some sort of lump sum in a stroke of luck. This stereotype is not only one of the single most damaging ideas to feminism in society today, but many professional women- women who would raise intelligent, well-fed and well-adjusted offspring put it off until the end of their careers, or off entirely, due to this assumption. This leaves these incredible people out of the gene pool, and can only hurt posterity. To talk about sustainability, sustaining a population segment with a high enough IQ to maintain and use the technological wonders we use today is one of the highest priorities we can have as a species- this trend has to stop.

I was scanning documents today, now that google docs allows uploading I feel I have no excuse to turn everything digital.

I was scanning and encrypting tax returns, and the numbers really struck me for some reason. Some older returns, ones that included such places as The Black Eyed Pea and Working For My Dad, and the pitiful numbers that were the final score for the year. I was looking at later ones and how the numbers had gone up, and thinking about being handed the sum total of the years 2004-2010 and attempting to live off the total for six years.

While I probably would save a bit, not paying any late fees or finance charges, I realized that the tax forms, notices, final counts and various mailings from various companies really do add up to my entire life’s work.

Everything I’ve ever done, reduced to a payable (or in my case, refundable) amount to the IRS. I could, while looking through the many offer letters, 1040s and W2s, letters of recommendation, medical expense logs and car insurance claims, recount every major event in my life. Every marriage, divorce, childbirth, car wreck, new job, layoff, and paycheck can be accounted for. And zero-sum’d.

Everything I’ve ever done in my life, relates to a final number. A score. Eventually, the number at the end accounts for the number on your social security card- and it’s made me realize one thing.

There are too damn many people. The fact that the number takes into account my friendships- every airtime minute and round of beer, every gallon of gasoline or sympathy pie baked. The fact that the number takes into account my love life- marriages, divorces, dates, emails (internet access, electricity?) and ice-cream trips at 2 AM. The fact that the number is compared in the census, to my family’s, to my friends, to people in my zip code, and to people in my same field of work. All these collections and data-driven assumptions about who I am, reducing me to a number and the fact that the number is correct- terrifying.

My name is Liz Howard- I score in the 90th percentile for people with my level of experience, education, vocation, gender, skillset, family history, location and lifestyle.

AEH …………………… 90%

I wonder if I can beat my score.

Sometimes we get working, or we get excited about a change in our lives. Sometimes it’s for something we love, sometimes it’s for something we hate. Sometimes we go off on an adventure, and even, times come where the adventure becomes our everyday lives. These are the times when we forget.

We forget to paint, or to read, or to ski or to blog. We forget to go on dates. We forget to follow the plans we lay out because of life and love and children and layoffs.

The problem is when we fall asleep, and never remember again. We go to work and we come home and we think about what we are forgetting to do as something we are forgetting to do- not something we love.

It becomes something we regard as secondary to our lives. It moves into a tertiary thing, and then something for “only” when we have time. And then we have no time.

The biggest change we can make for ourselves is to audit and reclaim our time. Look at the biggest detractors in your life- Commute, Chores, Spending time with individuals that you don’t enjoy, and don’t benefit from you. Imagine the difference these hours add up to.

With commutes upwards of an hour long, imagine getting back two to four hours a day? What could you do in two to four hours? Change your life?

It used to be a hallmark of geek culture, dispensing information. Having the most up-to-the-minute info about releases, or being on top of the rumor mill is one thing, but explanation was once a respected occupation of your time. Now, its become a second-class geek status.

Once, long ago in the halls of a high school or the collegiate-choked grounds of a campus were where you would find geeks patiently explaining details of complex scientific methodologies, math inundated with referential equations and the ins and outs of How To Fix Your Computer- but we have grown weary. Now that tech support has become an occupation we get paid for, no one seems to relish taking the time to educate their fellow man.

From “frustrations” tees at thinkgeek “no, I will not fix your computer” and “I read you’re e-mail”, the status has changed from “the smartest guy in the room” to “geek monkey”.

The trend of the crowd to recognize an avenue for exploitation has resulted in your average geek becoming overworked. He has coped by creating user-friendly tools for use by the massses in ascertaining their own information, rather than asking a question every time they had a thought.

Geeks however have become so used to getting their own info, and then pointing people towards Google or Wikipedia when they got a question more than a few times, they believe by now the public should have also learned this skill.

What do geeks do when faced with repetitive tasks? Create a tool that automates the process.

Hence sites like Let Me Google That For You- geeks have responded in a familiar way.

The growing trend, being irritated at questions with easily obtained answers, stems from the familiar Internet hate machine known as 4chan. One of the oldest and largest anonymous posting sites in the world, people are generally subjected to the rudest, most vile comments this side of xBox live- so it’s no wonder the trend started as a meme. This has become a legitimate tool over the months of use however- and it is now acceptable to send a link to your mother or a coworker, as long as they have at least some sense of humor.

Either way, the message is clear- geeks are tired of being your own personal search engine.

There is a Microsoft Knowledgebase Support Article that points out yet another flaw in IE8 or lower. This states that Microsoft Office can’t download documents when you set the page to expire immediately- so essentially you can’t have very secure pages if you want to export information to excel.

Firefox could do this since firefox .8

Chrome could do this from the get-go.

Safari and even Netscape Navigator have this capability, and most versions of AOL’s horrible browser can do this.

Why can’t Microsoft get with the program? The issue here is that MSIE will do what it damn well pleases. It always has, as it commands the majority of market share. Until we can get people on other, more stable web-standards compatible browsers we won’t be able to really open up the modern web.

Medicine, as a rule, is a very closed-source system. Even as the burgeoning information age claims basic diagnosis with WebMD.com and a host of other medical information sites, real info is locked in tightly controlled mediums. Resistance fighters like Google use tactics like Google Scholar and Google Trends to map information researchers across the scientific spectrum can use to come up with real-time theories about health and security, but a serious tool that has been tapped in the web era has yet to be explored in the medical community.
Anonymous usage statistics are used by Microsoft, Google, Yahoo and a host of other companies we know, and sometimes trust. Why not GlaxoSmithKline? Why not HP’s medical technology department?
Having our medical data available to these companies is a sensitive issue, one HIPPA aims to protect us from- but electing to share information is a hassle that many patients don’t take, or aren’t made aware of- holding hostage gigabytes of real-time data that could be used to report important information about drug side effects, interactions, rates of recovery and symptoms few patients even report.
Having, by default, anonymous usage data stored in a central repository, storing nothing personal along with the data, could lead to a serious boon for researchers. Understanding how different medicines interact with dietary patterns, other drugs, patients with accompanying disorders and genetic histories is too tempting to ignore.
Currently, the Obama administration is pushing to computerize all medical records, some say for this very reason. It’s an environmental, anti-bureaucratic decision that helps people to eliminate the endless shuffle of paper and reclaim many of the costs associated with medical billing- but the move has come under fire from conservatives looking for possible breaches of privacy. While true, the medical story of your life could be taken by ner-do-wells on the world wide web, the uses for such data are limited without your consent. Companies couldn’t use that data to screen you from employment without risking a major lawsuit. Creditors could not use that data for the same reason. The only people at risk to be taken advantage of stand to lose something due to political or business related reasons. While this information could affect the market negatively if say, a CEO’s heart problem surfaced, or an untimely reveal of a mental disorder might affect negotiations- but the lives saved, economic potential of more innovative drugs reaching the market, and genetic patterns being discovered before it’s too late might just be worth it.
Besides, there are ways around it- electing not to have your medical data stored online for instance, or even on the computer in the first place, might eliminate the complaints of all but the most hardcore libertarians.
In the end however, the nation’s medical records will eventually be computerized for one reason or another, and its only a matter of time then before the vast amount of data can be tapped in the name of progress.